David Sacks Steps Down as AI Czar — What Comes Next for U.S. Tech Policy
David Sacks is no longer America's AI czar. After a non-consecutive 130-day stint as former President Donald Trump's special government employee overseeing artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency policy, the veteran entrepreneur and investor has confirmed his departure from the role. His next move places him in an advisory capacity far removed from the day-to-day levers of federal power — and the shift is already raising questions about what it means for the future of American technology governance.
 |
| Credit: Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images |
From the White House to the Advisory Boardroom
Sacks confirmed in a video interview this week that he will now serve as co-chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, commonly known as PCAST. He will share that role with senior White House technology adviser Michael Kratsios. "I think moving forward as co-chair of PCAST, I can now make recommendations on not just AI but an expanded range of technology topics," Sacks said. The move, while still keeping him tethered to Washington, marks a significant step back from the kind of direct access to the president that defined his time as czar. PCAST is a federal advisory body — it studies, recommends, and reports, but it does not set policy.
A Council Stacked With Silicon Valley's Heaviest Hitters
What makes this particular iteration of PCAST unusual — and arguably unprecedented — is the sheer concentration of corporate firepower among its members. The initial 15 seats include names like Jensen Huang of Nvidia, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, Larry Ellison of Oracle, Google co-founder Sergey Brin, Marc Andreessen, Lisa Su of AMD, and Michael Dell. Sacks himself noted that this council has "the most star power of any group like this" in the body's long history, which stretches back to the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt. It is difficult to argue with that assessment. What is equally notable is how unlike previous versions of PCAST this one looks — built almost entirely from the executive suites of the very companies whose technologies the council will be advising on.
What PCAST Will Actually Work On
Sacks outlined a broad agenda for the council that spans artificial intelligence, advanced semiconductors, quantum computing, and nuclear power. In the near term, however, much of the focus is expected to fall on advancing the national AI framework released just last week. The framework is designed to establish a unified regulatory approach to artificial intelligence across the country, replacing what Sacks described as a chaotic tangle of state-level rules that vary dramatically from one state to the next. "You've got 50 different states regulating this in 50 different ways," he said, "and it's creating a patchwork of regulation that's difficult for our innovators to comply with." The push for federal coherence on AI policy is one of the administration's stated priorities, and PCAST is now positioned to play a supporting role in that effort.
How Much Influence Can PCAST Actually Have?
This question is not a minor one. The council's track record across administrations is decidedly uneven. The version assembled under Barack Obama was arguably the most productive in the body's modern history, publishing 36 reports across eight years, with two leading to concrete regulatory changes — including a rule that opened the market for over-the-counter hearing aids. The first-term council under the current administration, by contrast, took nearly three years just to confirm its initial members and produced a limited number of reports with little measurable policy impact. The Biden-era council leaned heavily academic, drawing from Nobel laureates and National Academy members, and issued a modest output before the administration concluded. The new council, dominated by sitting technology executives, is a different kind of animal entirely. Whether that translates to greater influence or simply greater name recognition remains to be seen.
The Podcast Comments That May Have Played a Role
What Sacks did not directly address in his Bloomberg interview was the timing of this transition and whether a recent public controversy factored into it. Earlier this month, on a widely followed podcast he co-hosts with several prominent tech investors, Sacks publicly urged the administration to seek an exit from the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Iran. He walked through a series of escalating risk scenarios — potential strikes on oil infrastructure in neighboring countries, threats to desalination facilities, and the possibility of nuclear involvement by regional actors — and made a case for what he called a "polite way out." The response from the president was terse: Trump told reporters that Sacks had not spoken with him about the war. Pressed on the matter this week by Bloomberg, Sacks was careful to distance himself from any suggestion that his comments represented official policy. "I'm not on the foreign policy team or the national security team," he said, framing his remarks as a personal perspective, nothing more.
An Ethics Arrangement That Drew Sharp Criticism
Sacks's departure from the czar role also brings renewed attention to the financial arrangements that defined his time in government. While shaping federal policy on artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency, Sacks maintained financial stakes in companies operating in both sectors through ethics waivers obtained during his tenure. That arrangement drew pointed criticism from ethics watchdogs, legal experts, and members of Congress who argued it presented a clear conflict of interest. The firm he co-founded, Craft Ventures, where he remains a partner, has not publicly outlined what his role there will look like going forward now that his government obligations have ended.
What His Exit Means for AI Policy Going Forward
Sacks's move away from the czar position does not eliminate his influence on American technology policy entirely, but it does dilute it considerably. The direct line to the president that came with the special government employee designation is gone. In its place is a seat at an advisory table alongside some of the wealthiest and most powerful figures in global technology. That is not a small thing, but it is a fundamentally different kind of power. PCAST can shape the conversation around technology policy. It can produce reports that influence legislation. It can lend credibility and momentum to regulatory proposals. What it cannot do is make decisions.
A Pivotal Moment for American AI Governance
The departure of the country's first AI czar comes at a moment when the regulatory stakes around artificial intelligence have never been higher. Governments around the world are racing to establish frameworks that balance innovation with accountability, and the choices made in the next two to three years are likely to define the landscape for at least a decade. Whether PCAST, with its remarkable roster of tech executives, will be a meaningful force in shaping those choices — or a prestigious advisory body that produces carefully worded reports with limited practical impact — is the central question that now hangs over Sacks's next chapter. What is clear is that the informal, behind-closed-doors influence that characterized his time as czar has now given way to something far more structured, and far more publicly visible.
