Activist Investor Ancora Publicly Opposes The WBD-Netflix Deal

WBD Netflix Deal Faces New Hurdle as Ancora Backs Paramount

The proposed $82.7 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by Netflix now confronts organized shareholder resistance after activist investment firm Ancora Holdings publicly rejected the deal and threw its support behind Paramount Global's competing offer. Ancora has acquired $200 million in WBD shares and argues Netflix's proposal carries excessive regulatory risk while delivering less immediate value to shareholders compared to Paramount's enhanced bid. With the streaming giant's takeover requiring majority shareholder approval, Ancora's intervention introduces fresh uncertainty into what many industry observers considered a near-certain transaction.

Credit: Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg / Getty Images

Why Ancora Opposes the Netflix-WBD Merger

Ancora Holdings made its position unequivocally clear in a Wednesday press release, aligning closely with Paramount's longstanding critique of the Netflix proposal. The firm contends that regulatory authorities would likely subject a Netflix-WBD combination to intense scrutiny given the merged entity's dominance across streaming, theatrical distribution, and valuable intellectual property libraries including DC Comics, Harry Potter, and HBO originals.

Unlike Paramount's all-cash structure, Netflix's offer includes significant stock consideration—meaning WBD shareholders would absorb execution risk during what could become a protracted regulatory review process lasting 18 to 24 months. Ancora emphasized that Paramount's revised proposal delivers substantially more cash upfront while including financial protections designed to compensate shareholders if deal closure experiences delays beyond December 31, 2026.

The activist investor also highlighted Paramount's pledge to cover WBD's $2.8 billion termination fee payable to Netflix should shareholders ultimately reject the streaming giant's offer. This guarantee effectively eliminates a major financial obstacle that had previously discouraged WBD leadership from seriously entertaining Paramount's alternative proposal.

Paramount's Strategic Countermove

Paramount significantly strengthened its position just one day before Ancora's announcement by introducing a novel shareholder incentive mechanism. Under the revised terms, WBD investors would receive an additional $0.25 per share for each fiscal quarter the transaction remains unclosed after the end of 2026. This structure directly addresses a primary concern among institutional investors: the opportunity cost of capital being tied up during extended regulatory reviews.

The incentive transforms what was previously perceived as a weaker financial offer into a potentially more attractive proposition when accounting for time value of money. For long-term shareholders concerned about market volatility during an extended approval process, Paramount's quarterly payments provide tangible compensation for patience—something Netflix's proposal lacks entirely.

Industry analysts note that Paramount's maneuver demonstrates sophisticated understanding of shareholder psychology. By converting abstract regulatory risk into concrete quarterly payments, the media company reframed the conversation from pure headline valuation to total expected shareholder returns over the transaction timeline.

Ancora's Playbook for Shareholder Mobilization

While Ancora's $200 million stake represents less than 1% of WBD's outstanding shares, the firm possesses considerable experience influencing corporate governance outcomes through coordinated shareholder activism. Ancora plans to leverage its position by formally voting against the Netflix transaction and publicly advocating for other institutional investors to reconsider their positions ahead of the shareholder vote expected later this year.

The firm has also threatened to pursue board accountability measures at WBD's 2026 annual meeting if directors refuse to engage seriously with Paramount's enhanced proposal. Such campaigns typically involve soliciting votes for director replacements or proposing shareholder resolutions demanding greater transparency around the board's evaluation process.

Ancora's strategy hinges on identifying institutional investors who may have conditionally supported the Netflix deal but remain open to alternatives offering superior risk-adjusted returns. Pension funds and mutual funds with fiduciary obligations to maximize near-term shareholder value could prove receptive to arguments emphasizing Paramount's cash-heavy structure and termination fee coverage.

The Netflix Deal's Existing Shareholder Support

Ancora faces an uphill battle given WBD's November disclosure that over 93% of voting shareholders had previously rejected Paramount's initial offer in favor of the Netflix transaction. That overwhelming margin suggested strong institutional confidence in Netflix's strategic vision and financial capacity to close the deal despite regulatory headwinds.

Netflix's proposal delivers approximately $38 per share in combined cash and stock consideration—representing a substantial premium to WBD's trading price before merger rumors surfaced. The streaming leader has also committed to maintaining Warner Bros.' theatrical release strategy and preserving jobs at key production facilities, addressing concerns about content strategy disruption.

Furthermore, Netflix brings unparalleled global distribution infrastructure and data analytics capabilities that could accelerate monetization of WBD's content library across emerging markets. Many shareholders view the combination as creating synergies impossible to achieve through a Paramount merger, given Paramount's own financial constraints and smaller international footprint.

Regulatory Realities Loom Large

The fundamental question dividing shareholder camps centers on regulatory feasibility. The Department of Justice has signaled heightened scrutiny of media consolidation following its successful challenge to previous industry mergers. A combined Netflix-WBD entity would control approximately 30% of U.S. streaming viewership while owning production studios responsible for nearly 40% of major theatrical releases.

Antitrust experts note that regulators might demand significant divestitures—including potentially HBO Max or Warner Bros. Pictures—as conditions for approval. Such requirements could diminish the strategic rationale for the merger while introducing valuation uncertainty during the review period. Paramount's comparatively smaller scale might face less regulatory resistance, though its own financial stability has raised separate concerns among credit rating agencies.

The European Commission would likely conduct parallel reviews given both companies' substantial operations across EU member states. International regulatory coordination could further extend the timeline beyond initial projections, increasing execution risk for shareholders awaiting deal closure.

What This Means for Streaming's Future

Beyond immediate financial considerations, the outcome will shape streaming industry dynamics for years to come. A successful Netflix-WBD merger would create an entertainment colossus with unprecedented vertical integration—from content creation through global distribution—potentially triggering further consolidation as competitors seek comparable scale.

Paramount's alternative path represents a more modest industry realignment, preserving three major vertically integrated competitors rather than consolidating into two dominant players. Consumer advocates have privately expressed preference for the Paramount scenario, arguing it maintains greater competitive pressure on subscription pricing and content diversity.

Content creators and talent agencies are also monitoring developments closely. Netflix has historically offered lucrative overall deals to top producers, while WBD's current cost-cutting environment has strained relationships with creative partners. The merger's structure could significantly influence talent compensation models and production budgets across Hollywood.

The Path Forward for WBD Shareholders

With shareholder votes likely occurring in late 2025 or early 2026, Ancora now faces the critical task of converting its vocal opposition into tangible voting power. The firm will need to demonstrate that Paramount's enhanced offer delivers superior risk-adjusted returns when accounting for regulatory timelines, termination fee coverage, and quarterly delay incentives.

WBD's board remains legally obligated to pursue the transaction delivering maximum value to shareholders. Should Ancora successfully rally sufficient support to create genuine uncertainty around the Netflix vote outcome, directors may feel compelled to reopen negotiations with both parties—potentially triggering a bidding war that benefits shareholders regardless of the ultimate winner.

Market observers note that activist interventions occasionally succeed not by winning outright votes, but by creating enough uncertainty to extract improved terms from the favored bidder. Netflix could respond to Ancora's campaign by increasing its cash component or introducing its own delay compensation mechanisms—moves that would validate Ancora's strategy even if the Paramount bid ultimately fails.

Bottom Line for Investors

The emergence of organized shareholder opposition transforms the Netflix-WBD transaction from a foregone conclusion into a genuine contest requiring careful evaluation of risk versus reward. Investors must now weigh Netflix's strategic vision and premium valuation against Paramount's reduced regulatory risk and enhanced shareholder protections.

For long-term holders prioritizing capital preservation during uncertain regulatory environments, Paramount's structure offers compelling advantages. Growth-oriented investors betting on Netflix's execution capabilities may still prefer the streaming giant's proposal despite its complexities. The coming months will test whether Ancora can convert its $200 million stake into meaningful influence—or whether the overwhelming initial shareholder support for Netflix proves resilient against activist pressure.

What remains undeniable is that media consolidation's next chapter will be written not solely by corporate executives, but through the deliberate choices of institutional investors weighing immediate returns against long-term industry transformation. The WBD shareholder vote has suddenly become one of 2026's most consequential financial decisions.