Tesla Autopilot Verdict Sparks Legal Battle
Tesla is pushing back against a $243 million jury verdict linked to its Autopilot system, filing a motion to have the decision overturned or retried. The case stems from a 2019 Florida crash that left one person dead and another severely injured, raising ongoing questions about driver responsibility versus technology reliability. Tesla’s lawyers argue the ruling conflicts with established tort law, constitutional protections, and basic logic, while reiterating that the driver was primarily at fault.
Image Credits:Artur Widak/NurPhoto / Getty Images
Details Of The Tesla Autopilot Verdict
The jury concluded that driver George McGee was two-thirds responsible for the crash, with Tesla bearing one-third of the liability. McGee was using Tesla’s Autopilot system at the time, a driver-assistance feature that still requires hands on the wheel and full driver attention. The fatal incident occurred when McGee’s Model S failed to stop at a sign and collided with a parked SUV, tragically killing passenger Naibel Benavides Leon and seriously injuring her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo.
Tesla’s Legal Strategy After The Verdict
Tesla’s legal team continues to argue that product liability law should only apply if a vehicle performs in ways that consumers cannot reasonably anticipate or poses unreasonably dangerous risks. The company insists the blame rests with the driver, who also settled separately with the victims. Notably, Tesla rejected a $60 million settlement offer from the victims before the trial, a decision that has since gained attention in the wake of the much larger jury award.
What The Tesla Autopilot Verdict Means For The Future
This case highlights the growing legal challenges surrounding semi-autonomous driving systems. While Tesla markets Autopilot and its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) technology as advanced tools, they are not substitutes for attentive driving. The $243 million Tesla Autopilot verdict could set precedents for future lawsuits, shaping how courts interpret the balance between driver accountability and manufacturer responsibility in accidents involving emerging vehicle technologies.
