Steve Davis DOGE Role Still Active After Exit
Despite officially leaving the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in May, Steve Davis appears to be far from gone. According to a new Wall Street Journal report, Davis — a longtime confidant of Elon Musk and former president of The Boring Company — is still actively involved in DOGE’s day-to-day operations. Insiders claim Davis continues to provide direction to current officials, casting doubt on the legitimacy of his exit. In private, Davis is said to have dismissed news of his departure as “fake,” sparking concern over who’s really calling the shots at DOGE.
Image Credits:Mark Ralston/AFP / Getty Images
This behind-the-scenes activity raises serious questions about the boundaries between private business interests and public service. Steve Davis has long been known for his extreme loyalty to Musk — going as far as sleeping at X (formerly Twitter) offices with his wife and infant child during Musk’s takeover. His thrifty leadership style, marked by micromanagement and approval of even minor expenses, appears to still influence internal decision-making. These revelations highlight growing tensions at DOGE, especially as it undergoes transformation amid political pressure and power struggles.
Internal Tensions Over Steve Davis DOGE Influence
Davis’s continued involvement has reportedly caused unease within DOGE. According to current and former officials cited by the Journal, his presence is fueling a division between employees loyal to Musk and those aligned with traditional government priorities — or even President Trump. Closed-door meetings have reportedly included “loyalty tests,” forcing staff to choose between Trump and Musk as the department resists White House efforts to scale back its authority. These tensions reflect a broader ideological clash over the future of federal innovation and the role of tech entrepreneurs in public policy.
This struggle is further complicated by Elon Musk’s own controversial political presence and strained relationship with Trump. Musk’s backing of “DOGE 2.0” — an internal rebranding effort that emphasizes modernizing government IT systems — is seen by some as a legitimate improvement plan. But critics argue it’s simply a thinly veiled attempt to keep the department aligned with Musk’s business ventures. If true, Davis’s quiet command at DOGE may be a strategic move to safeguard those interests under the radar.
Musk Allies Push for DOGE 2.0 Strategy
The so-called “DOGE 2.0” effort, supported by Musk allies including Davis, is reportedly shifting focus away from cost-cutting measures and toward government-wide tech upgrades. Supporters say the initiative is aimed at eliminating bureaucratic inefficiencies and modernizing outdated systems — a cause that aligns with Musk’s disruptive philosophy. However, skeptics are questioning the underlying motives. With Davis allegedly steering decisions from outside government channels, some see the initiative as another way for Musk-led companies like SpaceX, Tesla, and X to gain access to government contracts and influence IT infrastructure policy.
This concern is not without precedent. Musk’s business empire has already benefited from deep integration with government agencies through contracts, subsidies, and partnerships. Critics argue that the push for DOGE 2.0, while packaged as reform, risks turning a public agency into a tech billionaire’s playground. Davis’s continued involvement — despite his supposed resignation — only intensifies those concerns, making transparency and oversight more critical than ever.
Steve Davis DOGE Connection Raises Oversight Questions
Ultimately, the situation surrounding Steve Davis and DOGE underscores a growing accountability gap in the intersection of tech leadership and government influence. If Davis is truly still directing agency operations after stepping down, it raises serious ethical and legal questions. How much control should former officials — especially those tied to powerful private interests — have over federal departments? Who ensures these relationships are transparent and not being used to further corporate gain at the public’s expense?
As watchdog groups and the media push for answers, the broader implications go beyond just one department. The blending of public institutions with private tech influence is a trend that’s reshaping how policy, innovation, and governance intersect. Whether DOGE 2.0 turns out to be a meaningful modernization effort or a vehicle for Musk’s ambitions may depend largely on how figures like Steve Davis are held accountable — both in title and in practice.
Post a Comment