OpenAI vs Google: AI Models Score Gold at 2025 Math Olympiad
The OpenAI vs Google rivalry just hit a new level—this time, in one of the most prestigious math competitions in the world. Both tech giants independently announced that their AI models achieved gold-medal scores at the 2025 International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), outperforming most human participants and marking a major milestone in AI’s ability to solve complex reasoning tasks. These results have triggered both admiration and controversy, with AI researchers and tech insiders analyzing what this says about the future of artificial intelligence—and who’s winning the race.
Image Credits:ChristianChan/Shutterstock
Unlike previous years, both companies entered informal AI systems capable of reading natural language problems and generating full, proof-based answers without human intervention. That’s a huge leap from Google’s 2024 attempt, which relied on a more “formal” system requiring human translation of math problems into code. This year, OpenAI and Google DeepMind’s models each solved five out of six problems, securing gold-level performance and sending a clear signal: AI isn’t just good at coding or conversation anymore—it's mastering abstract reasoning in ways that were previously thought to be uniquely human.
AI Gold at the IMO: What It Means for Reasoning Models
The real story isn’t just that AI beat most high schoolers in the world’s toughest math contest—it’s how it did it. In previous years, AI struggled with tasks involving subjective or open-ended reasoning. The IMO pushes models to do more than memorize formulas; it challenges them to construct original, logical arguments—something even most adults find daunting. That’s why this gold medal win is being seen by researchers as a breakthrough in AI reasoning, especially in domains that can’t be easily verified by a computer, like math proofs.
According to researchers at both companies, these wins demonstrate that large language models (LLMs) are now capable of deeper, multi-step thinking. They’re no longer limited to generating code or answering simple factual questions. Instead, they can now handle the kind of nuanced problem-solving seen in real-world academic and research settings. This raises exciting prospects for AI’s ability to assist in areas like scientific discovery, education, and even writing complex legal or philosophical arguments. But it also renews concerns about how quickly AI is advancing—and whether humans are prepared for what's coming next.
OpenAI vs Google: A Rivalry Beyond Math
Beneath the gold medals lies a more human story: the ongoing OpenAI vs Google rivalry. The AI race has never just been about technology—it’s about prestige, influence, and attracting elite talent. Many top AI researchers come from competitive math backgrounds, so outperforming at the IMO is a subtle, but powerful way of signaling superiority. But the public fight over who announced what and when has also made this feel like a teen drama, with both companies jostling for attention on social media.
OpenAI announced its IMO success on Saturday morning, just hours after the official IMO results for human competitors were released. That timing led to backlash from Google DeepMind researchers, who accused OpenAI of jumping the gun and misrepresenting the competitive landscape. DeepMind’s CEO even posted criticisms online, suggesting that OpenAI’s announcement was “misleading.” This back-and-forth shows how public perception is becoming just as important as the actual technological advancements, and how the AI race is as much about vibes as it is about verification.
The Bigger Picture: What’s Next for AI and Public Trust
As both OpenAI and Google DeepMind push the boundaries of what AI can do, it’s becoming harder to separate real progress from PR spin. While these math Olympiad wins demonstrate real advancements in reasoning, they also reveal how competitive and politicized the AI space has become. For regular people, it raises important questions: Who decides what counts as a breakthrough? Can we trust companies to report results transparently? And most importantly, how do we ensure that AI development continues to benefit society as a whole?
From solving Olympiad problems to debating each other online, OpenAI vs Google is more than just a tech rivalry—it’s a window into the evolving dynamics of power, influence, and innovation in the 21st century. As AI models grow smarter, the companies that build them will wield increasing influence over everything from research to regulation. For now, we can celebrate the fact that machines are getting better at math—but we also need to keep asking the harder questions about what it all means.
Post a Comment